Low signal power with Bolt

Hello
I am using two Bolts to connect a machine to the network at a distance of 3 meters. The RSSI is very variable between -50 and -75 and there are occasional communication cuts. In this room, we know that there is a lot of electromagnetic reflection, there is metal and there is humidity. The best setup is with ATS3002 = 8 at the access point, but it’s far from perfect. How can we improve the performance of our antennas? You can see the setup on picture.


Thank you

Could you potentially try and connect over bluetooth and see if that seems to be more reliable?

I’ll give it a try, but I know our IT department isn’t too keen on the idea. Is the Bluetooth network more efficient in an environment where there is a lot of thought?
Thankyou

If the issue is that there’s a lot of traffic on the 2.4 and 5GHz frequencies in that area, it might be useful. It will be slower than the current connection that is being used but it may be more reliable if there’s less noise that’s interfering at that location.

Hi Tim

I tried the bluetooth network and was able to read an RSSi of -45, sensing the same result. The bolts are alone on the 5Ghz frequency to do a machine start / stop only, there is no other communication on the network. I have never been able to establish a connection with 2.4GHz. Connectivity is the issue, RSSI varies a lot from day to day. This room has been appraised and presents a lot of reflexion. All the RF systems in our factory had to adapt to this problem. Some days look like this (see photo). Can the Bolts be adapted to this type of situation?

Hi @Maxi,

Can you check and make sure that the bolts are on the most recent firmware

https://www.anybus.com/technical-support/pages/files-and-documentation/?ordercode=AWB2030

and show me how the bolts are mounted in those enclosures? Are they both facing straight up?

Also what is causing this interference that you were mentioning?

Hi
Thanks for the tip, I didn’t know there was an update newer than 2.03.02. After the update, the RSSI has remained around -60 today. The antennas are not in the vertical position in the PVC boxes. I didn’t see any impact based on their orientation. The antennas are only 4m away. The Bolt access point signal strength has been measured by other types of antennas and is very good. I believe the interference comes from and electromagnetic reflection. It’s when the waves bounce off so much reflective walls like metal that they end up making telecommunications difficult. An expertise has been made and we have this type of problem, it is common in food factories because, everything is metal, walls, ceiling, machines … Some telecom companies will use a dipole antenna arrangement with a differential telecommunication to filter the signal. Is the Bolt equipped to handle this type of environment?

Tanks for support

Depending on how these are facing the orientation may be an issue. This is the typical setup that we recommend along with showing their propagation patterns.

image

image

image

If the bolts are facing away from each other I could see that being an issue. One other thing I was wondering was if the bolts are out of the enclosures are they still having these issues?

-Tim

Hi Tim
The Bolts are installed face to face. Today I took the two bolts out of their PVC boxes and oriented them vertically at 0 ° and 90 °. The RSSI went from -60 to -55. It’s better but, it’s weak for an antenna that is only 14 feet away. Signal strength is still not constant. I also tested the signal strength of the access point. I plugged the Bolt client into my laptop and walked around the factory, through two plastic doors and over 50 feet was not enough to lose signal. The signal broke behind a concrete wall, I think it is good and more power than I need! Unfortunately, this does not change my signal cut problem. By the way, is RSSI = dbm?